Judge Philosophy Builder

Choose the options that best describe how you judge. Your clean Tabroom-ready philosophy will update automatically on the right.

Judge Information

Short answers are best. Students usually read judge philosophies quickly before the round.

Judge Name

Debate Judging Experience Choose the option that best shows both overall debate judging experience and PF-specific experience.

Other Debate Formats Judged Optional. If you selected an option about judging other formats, specify the format here.

Debate Background

Other Debate Formats Competed / Coached Optional. If your debate background is in another format, specify the format here.

Preferences & Style

Speaking Speed

Topic Knowledge

Flow / Notes

Debate Style Preference This helps students know whether to be more technical or more explanatory.

Jargon Preference

Round Evaluation

Second Rebuttal / Frontlining

Summary / Final Focus Expectations

Weighing / Framework

Drops / New Arguments

Evidence Expectations

Crossfire Preferences

Decision Factors

Choose the factors that most affect who wins and loses on your ballot.

Clear explanation Better weighing Clear impacts Strong logic Strong evidence Organization Dropped arguments Persuasive speaking Respectful behavior Other

Other Decision Factor

Other Notes for Debaters Optional. One or two sentences is enough, but feel free to write as much as you would like.

Tabroom Copy-Paste Version

This is the only part judges need to paste into Tabroom.

Generated Philosophy 0 characters

ⓘ This page runs entirely in your browser. It does not save or send your responses anywhere.

← Back to Team Kiko Tools